Uta Barth was born the month of January, in the year 1958.
She was born in Germany, Berlin and works as a contemporary photographer, and furthermore, she currently lives and works in Los Angeles, California.
https://www.tate.org.uk/art/artists/uta-barth-2678
I am very interested in the minimlism that is created throughout Uta Barth’s work, I find it quite compelling and visually pleasing, yet intreguied with the meaning.
This photographer is extremely interested in translations of “photographic perception to human perception” while often choosing to take photographs of “ethereal subject matters” (curtains submersed with light) – “Which, no matter the fidelity to the real world, becomes abstracted or distorted when seen as a photograph”
In previous work Barth directs the viewers awareness to the subconscious engagement the viewer has with “the act of looking”.
Throughout many interviews that Uta Barth has taken part in, she explains that she tries to find ways to shift the audience’s attention from the object, and more to the perceptual process.
“How can I make you aware of your own activity of looking, instead of losing your attention to thoughts about what it is that you are looking at?
http://www.artnet.com/artists/uta-barth/
Throughout many of the photographs that I have looked into created by Uta Barth, I have been extremely interested in the way that she works, looking much more into the meaning and perception of the way an image is seen by the audience as opposed to the specifics of an object. Her work is about observation that is overlooked.
She “paints with light” in her home, using the surrounding area as simple as her home, the walls, the curtains etc.
“That remind us not only of both the infinite and finite capacities of an eye’s perception, but of one’s bodily relationship with the background as well”
Another thing that is extremely unique to this photographers work is the way it is so clear how somebody can/could interrupt or create a composition of space.
When she began studying as an undergraduate, she was taking painting class, “I wanted to render certain spatial configurations and to study the light of these imagined scenes” and so it is clear that Uta Barth’s has been interested in the art of light and how it is perceived for a lot of her career.
“I did not have the skill to paint the images directly, so I started to make photographs to work from. But repeatedly, I found the photographs that I thought to be the disposable source materials much more interesting and more engaging than the paintings and drawings I made from them”
In this very interview, she also tells the audience how the process of making photographs forced her to learn how to truly see the light, how to work on composition to make the most mundane subject matter into a compelling image, showing that as she has worked as a creative person who is extremely interested into the actual idea of light, photography has helped her create her ideal.
Since a young age she has used her camera to capture the information that surrounds humans every single day, which can be seen as rather “odd” or “boring” but throughout her work, she truly shows the way something perceived as simple can be full of details and can make quite beautiful outcomes.
This photographer works well to create minimalistic images.
This was the start of her work and she soon began looking into sculpture, work, film and installation, however, she still continued to work with a camera.
“I wanted to make work about looking, about visual perception as content in and of itself. As the camera lens functions much like the human eye, photography seemed the most appropriate medium for those interests. I think my very early work was much about that. I wanted to rethink what we take for granted in an image, to examine how images make meaning and how to break out of the traditional way of making a photograph. I wanted to challenge that by removing the central subject and to look at and think about the background, which ascribes meaning to the subject in an almost subliminal way.” in which, I believe the majority of her images emulate this well.
Some of her images are perceived as “out of focus” and despite the traditional way of taking photographs, Uta Barth’s has stated that she does this on purpose,
“So I am photographing the volume of a room instead of its walls, the atmosphere of a rainstorm instead of the landscape the rain falls on.”
“This lack of focus happens in the human eye much the way it does for the camera, but our eyes are always darting about and constructing a seamless scene. If you try hard to hold the focus on one point and pay attention to the background of that, you will see it falls out of focus, just like my images do.”
She participates in her images, just as the light on the curtains do, she stops being a viewer, she arranges her curtains, by drawing them, creating texture throughout her images.
“I am moving the curtain to change the formation of a line of light that starts out being razor-thin and over the hours grows into a thick band of light. In the second series, I arrange the blinds to make Mondrian-like geometric abstractions out of light. This project can only be photographed for a few days each year, days in which the projecting sunlight is perfectly perpendicular to the geometry of lines of my closet doors. So I am literally drawing with light.”
“Liz Siegel at the Art Institute of Chicago wrote a text for my exhibition there in which she points out that the translation, the literal meaning of the word photographyis: “to write or draw with light.” these images are photographs in the most literal way.”
https://bombmagazine.org/articles/light-looking-uta-barth/
And so, when looking into this creative persons work, I truly became inspired with the minimalism and the meanings throughout. I find it extremely interesting that this photographer challenges the “typical photography ways” such as taking photographs of a specific object or in focus, by doing the opposite.
I decided to take images that relate to this. I took an array of images relating to the idea of looking into backgrounds as opposed to a subject and images that arent “in focus”
I also used everyday objects to “literally paint with light” (and shadows). There is a typical question of mystery throughout her images also, such as., what is through the curtains, what are the actual shadows, and i believe that i looked into this as well, especially through my curtain images. She works with both warm and cold tones, this is due to the different times of the day she shoots and the types of colours within the photographs, capturing the duality that light can give off that people simply pass by, which is another thing that i tried to emulate, working this way also shows how light can be seen different depending what it is coming from (such as, the colours found on a curtain)
Furthermore, her images arent complicating. She uses minimlism to her advantage, with some negative space being created. I tried to not over-complicate my images, experimenting with composition, light and the actual space to do this.
However, I also looked into my own way of working and looked into how light can also effect simple objects, which is something else that is rather interesting, looking into books and pillows. Moreover, some of my photographs are a lot darker than this photographers pieces of work and that was purely for experimentation with my Light and Shadow subject, looking into how light and shadow can be manipulated in the dark as well as in the light.
Typically, I took photographs of things that can be perceived as backgrounds, shedding literal light on the idea that backgrounds are just as interesting, minimalistically.
I personally like the way my images have turned out, showing detail and texture through light and shadow and it is defintley something that I would like to take further, if not by just working with compositions and how space is created to tell meaning.